NoonPost NoonPost

NoonPost

  • Home
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • Files
  • Long Reads
  • Podcast
AR
Notification Show More
نون بوست
“There Are Nights I Can’t Close My Eyes”: How Gazans Are Living in Homes on the Brink of Collapse
نون بوست
From al-Jolani to Ahmad al-Shara: The Evolution of Syria’s New Leader
نون بوست
When Political Islam Receded in Egypt: Who Filled the Void?
نون بوست
An Extension of Genocide: Gaza’s Detainees Speak Out
نون بوست
A Tightrope Between Survival and Sovereignty: The Syrian Government Faces Normalization Pressures
نون بوست
American Aircraft Carriers: Has the Era of “100,000 Tons of Diplomacy” Ended?
نون بوست
U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail
نون بوست
Transformations of Israeli Judaism: Between the Victim Complex and the Colonizer’s Doctrine
نون بوست
The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links
نون بوست
Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?
نون بوست
Syria’s Northeast on Edge: QSD Between Ankara and Damascus
نون بوست
Has Europe Changed Its Stance on Israel… or Just Its Language?
NoonPost NoonPost
AR
Notification Show More
نون بوست
“There Are Nights I Can’t Close My Eyes”: How Gazans Are Living in Homes on the Brink of Collapse
نون بوست
From al-Jolani to Ahmad al-Shara: The Evolution of Syria’s New Leader
نون بوست
When Political Islam Receded in Egypt: Who Filled the Void?
نون بوست
An Extension of Genocide: Gaza’s Detainees Speak Out
نون بوست
A Tightrope Between Survival and Sovereignty: The Syrian Government Faces Normalization Pressures
نون بوست
American Aircraft Carriers: Has the Era of “100,000 Tons of Diplomacy” Ended?
نون بوست
U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail
نون بوست
Transformations of Israeli Judaism: Between the Victim Complex and the Colonizer’s Doctrine
نون بوست
The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links
نون بوست
Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?
نون بوست
Syria’s Northeast on Edge: QSD Between Ankara and Damascus
نون بوست
Has Europe Changed Its Stance on Israel… or Just Its Language?
Follow US

How the Sudanese Revolution Lives On in the Hearts of Exiles

عماد عنان
Emad Anan Published 26 March ,2026
Share
نون بوست
نون بوست

At “Al-Usṭūra” Café in the heart of Al-Haram, Giza, 27-year-old Abdullah, a young Sudanese man, sat gazing into his coffee cup as if peering into a distant homeland. Reflections of Khartoum flickered in his eyes, while the silence around him echoed with chants from the streets once more.

Seven years have passed, but December has never left him. It returned, alive and pulsing, just as it first erupted from chests and throats demanding change.

Abdullah retraced the steps of those early protests starting from the day he decided to break through fear, all the way to the fall of Omar al-Bashir. Around him sat dozens of people from different regions and age groups, bound less by geography than by shared memory.

They listened closely as he spoke, his words brimming with both nostalgia and fire, as if unlocking a hidden portal back to those fateful days.

Suddenly, Abdullah stood up. His voice rang out in the café, as if carried from Sixty Street or the heart of the sit-in. He declared that the revolution was not over, that its spirit remained alive within them no matter how much time had passed.

He said the December Revolution was not merely a fleeting political event, but a sacred covenant between the people and the sacrifices of their martyrs, their wounded, and their missing.

With a voice heavy with longing, he added that honoring this covenant required more than words it demanded defense of the revolution’s values: freedom, peace, and justice; resistance to war in all its forms; solidarity with women and marginalized communities; and a steadfast commitment to the dream of a democratic, civilian state.

The emotional charge in the room could no longer be contained. The café erupted with chants drawn from the depths of collective memory: “Freedom… Peace… Justice… The revolution is the people’s choice,” and “Fall or not… We’re staying strong.” For a few moments, the café transformed into a miniature revolutionary square, as if December had crossed the border to visit Giza.

Seven years ago, millions of Sudanese rallied around a single dream, a single flag, a single goal: to bring down a regime that had suffocated them for decades, and to uproot authoritarianism from its very foundation.

Back then, the dream was both simple and grand: a new Sudan one that respects human dignity, safeguards citizenship, enshrines liberty, and restores the meaning of honor. While that dream may remain unfinished, it is certainly not dead.

Today, as Sudanese live in exile with bodies far from home but hearts still tethered to its chapters the question returns with every December anniversary: What remains of that revolutionary spirit in the hearts of those millions forced to flee by the generals’ war for power?

The homeland may no longer be near, but December still lives within them as an idea, a yearning, and a deferred promise of return.

A Present, Not a Memory-A Future, Not the Past

“Who said December is just a memory?” asked Ahmed Kanan, a 55-year-old academic from the University of Khartoum, now residing in Cairo, surprising us when we inquired about the revolution’s seventh anniversary.

It wasn’t a rhetorical question, but a philosophical jolt that challenged the very premise of our inquiry. With the certainty of someone who has lived the experience and understands its gravity, Kanan insisted: December is a living present, not a relic of the past, and a future that cannot be buried in history.

Speaking to Noon Post, Kanan described December as a living entity breathing with the Sudanese wherever they are. He affirmed that the revolution endures as long as the people do, and that it remains the brightest moment in Sudan’s contemporary history the rare spark that united Sudanese across ideological and political divides.

It is the path they will continue to walk, no matter how many obstacles arise or how long the journey takes.

This view was far from isolated. It was echoed by Nahed, an educator in her fifties living in Al-Haram, Giza. She spoke with quiet conviction born of lived experience, emphasizing that December holds a particularly deep place in the hearts of Sudanese women.

For them, the revolution wasn’t merely a political struggle it was a direct confrontation with a regime that trampled their dignity, stripped away their rights, and institutionalized discrimination against them.

In a poignant moment, Nahed revealed to Noon Post that she insists on teaching the revolution with all its details to the children in the kindergarten she runs in Egypt. She doesn’t teach it as a history lesson, but as a seed of hope a legacy she tries to plant in young hearts where adults failed to protect it.

She believes that what faltered in one generation may blossom in the next, and that the path to a free and democratic Sudan might begin with a story told to a child and a dream that grows with time.

Thus, December is not simply a memory summoned in the minds and souls of its children—it is a spirit that resists erasure, that insists on survival in words, in memory, and in the eyes of children who never lived it but may one day carry it forward.

A Revolution Stolen by Generals

“Everything was unfolding as we had dreamed as imagined by the revolutionaries in their minds and their blood until the military came and overturned the table, dragging Sudan years backwards.” With these heavy words, Sudanese lawyer and human rights advocate Asaad Al-Mirghani began his conversation with us. His words seemed to carry the rubble of a dream never allowed to be completed.

Al-Mirghani traced Sudan’s current tragedy to its core: the generals’ unrelenting hunger for power. Speaking to Noon Post, his tone carried the weight of a witness to a broken era. He said the military could not tolerate the idea of a civilian-led government that would return them to the barracks, as the revolution demanded.

Such a shift would have stripped them of the privileges amassed over decades of dominance. For this reason, the coup against the revolution wasn’t a reaction it was a deliberate choice, a banner under which both the army and the Rapid Support Forces united.

But once the civilian government led by Abdalla Hamdok was ousted, cracks began to show within the military’s own ranks. Power struggles erupted, with each faction seeking absolute control. No partners. No accountability. According to Al-Mirghani, this is how Sudan was plunged into an open-ended spiral of violence, with no end in sight.

He went further, insisting that none of this was spontaneous. Everything had been premeditated. The military’s initial alignment with the revolution was merely a mask a tactic to contain the street and avoid direct confrontation. But when the critical moment of transition to civilian rule arrived, the masks dropped all at once, revealing the military’s true face—unapologetic and unmasked.

And yet, amid the darkness, Al-Mirghani’s words held a glimmer of hope. He firmly believes that Sudan’s current suffering does not extinguish December it summons it. Within the spirit of that revolution lies the path to liberation from the heavy burdens of the past and the lingering agents of dictatorship. Despite the wounds, it remains the final cry that refuses to fall silent.

December: The Road to Salvation

The voices of Kanan, Abdullah, Nahed, and Al-Mirghani are but reflections of a broader Sudanese consciousness echoed in civil society statements, exile conversations, and the silences of destroyed homes. Despite differences in place or language, they are united by one conviction: the road to salvation begins with December.

Seven years on, the revolution has not faded into a pale memory. It remains alive in the collective conscience the only national compass out of the deep crisis engulfing Sudan.

This sentiment is shared by the Sudanese diaspora, those forced from home but still anchored to it in heart. Their demands are painfully simple: commit to the revolution’s goals freedom, peace, justice, and democratic civilian governance; end the war immediately; and initiate a comprehensive political process that preserves Sudan’s unity and sovereignty, and restores its people’s right to safety and dignity.

In this context, the National Umma Party issued a statement heavy with the weight of tragedy, noting that this year’s anniversary comes amid a devastating war unprecedented in modern Sudanese history a conflict that has left behind death, displacement, and vast violations against civilians, while dismantling state institutions and threatening the nation’s social fabric.

The party warned that the war is a dangerous attempt to abort the December Revolution and undermine its achievements a descent into proxy conflicts and regional entanglements.

Nevertheless, it reaffirmed its commitment to the revolution’s path, calling on Sudanese at home and abroad to rally behind the December project, reject all narratives justifying war or division, and demand that both warring parties shoulder their moral and historical responsibilities and cease hostilities.

Similarly, the Sudanese Congress Party and other civil forces reiterated that December was a transformational revolution that ended three decades of repression and opened a door to democratic civilian rule before the coup slammed it shut and war flung open the gates of hell.

They stressed that the war has returned Sudan to isolation, drained its resources, and torn apart its social fabric with hate speech and racism. Still, they insisted that December remains a moral imperative and a unifying national vision.

Their closing message was clear: war may dominate the present, but December still inhabits the future firmly rooted in the hearts of Sudanese people and their central path to a state built on freedom, peace, and justice.

In distant exiles, where cafés resemble one another and faces change, December’s spirit lives on in Sudanese imaginations as a final refuge from despair. In Cairo, Nairobi, Addis Ababa, and beyond, the revolution is no longer a past event to be recalled—but a living memory experienced daily, carried in accents, in songs, and in long conversations about a betrayed yet unbroken homeland.

Four years have passed since the military stole the dream, but they failed to steal its essence. December remains a defiant idea, a wound that refuses to close over injustice, a promise postponed but not forgotten.

And so, for Sudanese abroad, the only road to redemption is through December—not as a sentimental yearning, but as a national project to reclaim what was lost: a state that respects human dignity, a civilian government that serves its people, and a peace that brings people back to their homes and their memories.

They believe the dream snatched by force can be reclaimed with persistence, and that the revolution, though faltering, was never defeated it’s merely waiting for its next moment. For them, December isn’t the end of the story it’s the beginning. The only path through which Sudanese can reclaim their homeland and write their dream anew.

Download this article as PDF
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Email Copy Link
عماد عنان
By عماد عنان كاتب صحفي وباحث في الإعلام الدولي
Follow:
Previous Article نون بوست Sanctions Target Leaders and Factions in Syria’s New Army-What Are Damascus’s Options?
Next Article نون بوست Days Before the Deadline… Where Is the March Agreement Between Damascus and the SDF Headed?

Read More

  • U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail
  • The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links
  • Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?
  • Syria’s Northeast on Edge: QSD Between Ankara and Damascus
  • Has Europe Changed Its Stance on Israel… or Just Its Language?
part of the design
NoonPost Weekly Newsletter

You May Also Like

U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail

U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail

إسراء سيد Esraa sayed 8 April ,2026
The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links

The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links

فريق التحرير Noon Post 8 April ,2026
Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?

Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?

فريق التحرير Noon Post 8 April ,2026

هل تهتز العلاقات المغربية الإيرانية من جديد؟

فريق التحرير
Noon Post Published 20 August ,2015
Share
we_are_rebels_western_sahara

مرّت العلاقات الإيرانية المغربية تاريخيا بهزات دائمة، قُطع فيها التواصل بين البلدين في أكثر مرّة؛ مؤخّرا، كاد تقرير تلفزي بثته قناة “بريس تي في” (Press TV)، وهي قناة إيرانية رسمية ناطقة باللغة الإنجليزية،حول الصحراء المُتنازع عليها، أن ينفث النار في جذوة التوتر الدبلوماسي الإيراني المغربي الذي لم يمض كثيرا على انطفائها، مرحليا.

الصحراء المغربية آخر المُستعمرات الإفريقية

وبالرجوع إلى مُحتوى الفيلم الوثائقي مثار الجدل الذي أنتجته هذه القناة الإيرانية باللغة الأنجليزية وبلغت مُدّته 26 دقيقة، تحت عنوان “نحن متمردون : الصحراء الغربية”، نجد أنه تضمن مشاهد من داخل مخيمات تندوف، وشهادات لصحراويين ينددون بما سموه احتلال المغرب للصحراء.

وعلى مُستوى المضمون، تلخصت رسالة مخرجه حول أن “الصحراء على الحدود مع المغرب، والجزائر، وموريتانيا، والمحيط الأطلسي، هي آخر مستعمرة في إفريقيا تناضل من أجل استقلالها”، معتبرا أن ما سماه “الشعب الصحراوي محروم اليوم من الحق في الحصول على أرض يعيش فيها بسلام وحرية”.

وجاء في الوثائقي أن “الشعب الصحراوي انقسم إلى قسمين، الذين يعيشون في “المنطقة المحتلة”، وتحملوا الاحتلال الذي فُرض عليهم بالعنف من طرف المغرب، ثم أولئك الذين يقيمون اليوم في مخيمات اللاجئين في الصحراء الجزائرية، أو ضمن شريط ضيق من الأراضي الجرداء” وفق تعبير القناة.

وفي تقديم هذا الفيلم الوثائقي، أكدت القناة الإيرانية بأنه عمل “يصور الحياة في ظل الاحتلال، والمنفى للشعب الصحراوي”، فيما استدلت بشهادات صحراويين تحدثوا عن “ضرورة استرداد حريتهم بالقوة كما انتزعت بالقوة”، دون أن تمنح فرصة للجانب المغربي للإدلاء برأيه في هذا الملف، وهو ما أثار حفيظة المغاربة، قبل أن يتم سحبه من شبكة الإنترنت.

تحليلات مغربية حول المُحتوى والتوقيت

وبمثل حساسيتها المُفرطة والمعهودة تُجاه كل ما يتعلق بملف الصّحراء، تناولت وسائل الإعلام المغربية بث هذا الوثائقي بغضب شديد خاض في الخلفيات التي دفعت قناة تُعتبر واجهة إعلامية إيرانية رسمية مُوجّهة للخارج ضمن الإمبراطورية الإعلامية الإيرانية التي تخضع لإشراف دستوري مباشر من المرشد.

وفي قراءته التي أفاد بها موقع هيسبرس، قال رشيد يلوح، الباحث المغربي في الدراسات الإيرانية بمركز الإمارات للسياسات، أن المادة المعروضة لم تكن مهنية باعتبار أنها نقلت الرواية الصحراوية دون أن تتيح للسلطات المغربية فرصة الإدلاء بدلوها حول الموضوع،  وأضاف أن توقيت بث الوثائقي الذي جاء أسابيع قليلة بعد أزمة مماثلة سببها تقرير مسيئ للمغرب نُشر في موقع “فارس نيوز” التابع لجهاز الحرس الثوري سيُعزز الشكوك المغربية تجاه نوايا إيران في المنطقة.

وذهبت بعض التحاليل لاعتبار أن نشر هذا الوثائقي في هذا الوقت بالذات إثر توقيع اتفاق النووي الإيراني الذي منح الدولة الفارسية شعورا بالتفوق جدّد أطماعها في التحرك خارج مجالها الحيوي للتأثير والتحكم في المحيط العربي الإستراتيجي، في حين اعتبر بعضها الآخر أن إيران أرادت من خلال هذا الوثائقي إرضاء شريكه التاريخي في المنطقة، الجزائر، وبعث رسالة طمأنة مفادها أن استئناف العلاقات الدبلوماسية بينها وبين الرباط لن تؤثر على الشراكة بينهما.

محاولات لتطويق الأزمة الدبلوماسية المرتقبة

وفي أول رد رسمي إيراني على الفيلم الوثائقي، وفيما بدا أنه محاولة لتطويق الأزمة وهي في مهدها خاصة مع طبيعة الدبلوماسية المغربية الصاخبة، أكدت السفارة الإيرانية بالرباط في بيان لها ،الأربعاء، على “الموقف الرسمي للجمهورية الإسلامية الإيرانية تجاه المملكة المغربية الشقيقة، الداعي لبناء علاقات ودية تستند على تلازم الاحترام المتبادل للوحدة والسيادة الترابية وعدم التدخل في الشؤون الداخلية للغير”.

وذكرت السفارة في بيانها  “بالمواقف الواضحة والشفافة للجمهورية الإسلامية الإيرانية تجاه قضية الصحراء”، مؤكدة دعم بلادها لقرارات منظمة الأمم المتحدة ومجلس الأمن في هذه المسألة،  وأوضحت السفارة، أن “المسائل غير الدقيقة التي جاءت في التقرير المذكور لا تعكس مطلقا وجهات النظر والمواقف الصريحة للجمهورية الإسلامية الإيرانية”، مضيفة على ضرورة صيانة العلاقات الثنائية بين طهران والرباط من أن تتأثر بأجواء وسائل الإعلام.

بغض النظر عن خلفيات بث هذا الوثائقي وتوقيته، الثابت أن مسألة الصحراء لازالت تُمثّل إحدى مُحدّدات الدبلوماسيتين المغربية والجزائرية وأن أي طرف دولي لربط الصلة مه هذا الطرف أو ذاك يحتاج أن يُبين موقفه من المسألة قبل الحديث في باقي التفاصيل.

كما أن الظاهر بوضوح في هذه المسألة هو ازدواجية الخطابة التي تُعتبر سمة الموقف الرسمي الإيراني، بين خطاب الثورة الصادر عن المرشد وحرسه الثوري، وخطاب الدولة الذي تُمثّله الأطراف المُنتخبة كواجهة للتسويق الإعلامي والعلائقي.

TAGGED: العلاقات الإيرانية العربية
Download this article as PDF
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Email Copy Link
فريق التحرير
By فريق التحرير تقارير يعدها فريق تحرير نون بوست.
Follow:
Next Article نون بوست The Stigma of “ISIS”: A Heavy Legacy Haunting Women and Children of Former Members

Read More

  • U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail
  • The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links
  • Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?
  • Syria’s Northeast on Edge: QSD Between Ankara and Damascus
  • Has Europe Changed Its Stance on Israel… or Just Its Language?
part of the design
NoonPost Weekly Newsletter

You May Also Like

U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail

U.S. Regime‑Change Policies: Why They Are Destined to Fail

إسراء سيد Esraa sayed 8 April ,2026
The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links

The Gulf’s Balancing Act: Iran, Israel, and Hidden Links

فريق التحرير Noon Post 8 April ,2026
Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?

Iraq–Turkey Oil Export Treaty: Why Did Ankara Cancel It After 52 Years?

فريق التحرير Noon Post 8 April ,2026
dark

An independent media platform founded in 2013, rooted in slow journalism, producing in-depth reports, analysis, and multimedia content to offer deeper perspectives on the news, led by a diverse young team from several Arab countries.

  • Politics
  • Society
  • Rights & Liberties
  • Opinions
  • History
  • Sports
  • Education
  • Technology
  • Economy
  • Media
  • Arts & Literature
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Travel
  • Cinema & Drama
  • Food
  • Health
  • Culture
  • Latest Reports
  • Files
  • Long Reads
  • Interviews
  • Podcast
  • Interactive
  • Encyclopedia
  • In Pictures
  • About Us
  • Our Writers
  • Write for Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advanced Search
Some rights reserved under a Creative Commons license

Removed from favorites

Undo
Go to mobile version