NoonPost NoonPost

NoonPost

  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • In Depth
  • Focus
  • Explainers
  • Stories
AR
Notification Show More
وجود قيادتين في حزب الشعب الجمهوري خلق مشهدًا معقدًا
After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party?
نون بوست
“The heavy price Syrians paid will unite them”: An interview with Dr. Radwan Ziadeh
ميناء اللاذقية يستطيع استقبال الحاويات فقط أما نقلها إلى الداخل فيحتاج إلى شبكة أخرى
The route for goods from Latakia: Can Syria reconnect its sea to its inland?
نون بوست
After the Hasakah and Kobani elections, how far has the formation of Syria’s parliament progressed?
شاشة حاسوب تعرض سجلاً لجثة مجهولة الهوية في قاعدة بيانات الأشخاص المفقودين في مستشفى الناو في أم درمان، 18 أبريل 2026 (AP)
Graves without names: How many people are missing in Sudan’s war?
نون بوست
Asian partnerships and alternative corridors: Abu Dhabi’s strategy to escape the Gulf umbrella
نون بوست
How Is Turkish Military Technology Redrawing the Balance of Power in North Africa?
"أراد" هي وحدة "تدخل" مستحدثة في سلاح الجو التابع لجيش الاحتلال
“Arad”.. Why Did the Occupation Create an All-Female Force to Protect Its Air Bases?
عاد قطار الخليج إلى الواجهة بعد الإعلان عن إنجاز 50 ٪ من المشروع
A Revolution on Iron Rails: The Gulf Railway from the 2009 Dream to the 2030 Race
يقدّم عناصر من الحرس الثوري والباسيج دورات قصيرة للمدنيين على التعامل مع الكلاشينكوف
Kalashnikovs in the Squares.. How Is Iran Mobilizing Civilians for War?
نون بوست
From Public Service to Crisis Commerce: Commercial Electricity Deepens Taiz’s Suffering
سفن في مضيق هرمز، مسندم، عُمان، 27 أبريل/نيسان 2026 (رويترز)
A Digital Artery in a Minefield.. What Do We Know About Gulf Cables Beneath Hormuz?
NoonPost NoonPost
AR
Notification Show More
وجود قيادتين في حزب الشعب الجمهوري خلق مشهدًا معقدًا
After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party?
نون بوست
“The heavy price Syrians paid will unite them”: An interview with Dr. Radwan Ziadeh
ميناء اللاذقية يستطيع استقبال الحاويات فقط أما نقلها إلى الداخل فيحتاج إلى شبكة أخرى
The route for goods from Latakia: Can Syria reconnect its sea to its inland?
نون بوست
After the Hasakah and Kobani elections, how far has the formation of Syria’s parliament progressed?
شاشة حاسوب تعرض سجلاً لجثة مجهولة الهوية في قاعدة بيانات الأشخاص المفقودين في مستشفى الناو في أم درمان، 18 أبريل 2026 (AP)
Graves without names: How many people are missing in Sudan’s war?
نون بوست
Asian partnerships and alternative corridors: Abu Dhabi’s strategy to escape the Gulf umbrella
نون بوست
How Is Turkish Military Technology Redrawing the Balance of Power in North Africa?
"أراد" هي وحدة "تدخل" مستحدثة في سلاح الجو التابع لجيش الاحتلال
“Arad”.. Why Did the Occupation Create an All-Female Force to Protect Its Air Bases?
عاد قطار الخليج إلى الواجهة بعد الإعلان عن إنجاز 50 ٪ من المشروع
A Revolution on Iron Rails: The Gulf Railway from the 2009 Dream to the 2030 Race
يقدّم عناصر من الحرس الثوري والباسيج دورات قصيرة للمدنيين على التعامل مع الكلاشينكوف
Kalashnikovs in the Squares.. How Is Iran Mobilizing Civilians for War?
نون بوست
From Public Service to Crisis Commerce: Commercial Electricity Deepens Taiz’s Suffering
سفن في مضيق هرمز، مسندم، عُمان، 27 أبريل/نيسان 2026 (رويترز)
A Digital Artery in a Minefield.. What Do We Know About Gulf Cables Beneath Hormuz?
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Society
  • Culture
  • In Depth
  • Focus
  • Explainers
  • Stories
Follow US

Why Is Turkey Insisting on Extending Its Military Presence in Libya?

زيد اسليم
Zaid Esleem Published 24 December ,2025
Share
نون بوست

The Turkish Parliament has extended the mandate for its military forces in Libya for another two years starting January 2, 2026. The decision is based on a presidential memorandum reaffirming Ankara’s continued support for Libya’s internationally recognized government, its commitment to maintaining the ceasefire, preventing renewed chaos, and safeguarding Turkish interests in the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa while pledging to uphold international law.

This move underscores Ankara’s determination to maintain its military and political presence in Libya amid a complex regional and global landscape. But what motivates Turkey to extend its presence? What objectives is it pursuing? And how might this step affect the balance of power in Libya and the region?

Background of Turkey’s Military Involvement

Turkey’s military presence in Libya began in late 2019 after the former Government of National Accord (GNA), led by Fayez al-Sarraj, signed a security and military cooperation memorandum with Ankara. This was followed by a maritime boundary demarcation agreement.

These accords formed the legal basis for Turkey’s involvement. In early January 2020, the Turkish Parliament approved an official mandate allowing the deployment of troops and military advisors to Libya, at the request of the Tripoli government and under Article 92 of the Turkish Constitution.

The mandate was swiftly implemented on the ground through the deployment of advisors, support units, and advanced military equipment, tipping the balance of the conflict particularly during the Tripoli battle between the GNA forces and eastern forces led by Khalifa Haftar from 2019 to 2020.

نون بوست
Turkish Armed Forces train forces of the Government of National Accord in Libya / Anadolu

Turkey’s intervention was instrumental in repelling the assault on the capital and in helping western forces retake key positions, most notably al-Watiya Airbase in May 2020. This shift paved the way for a UN-brokered nationwide ceasefire in October of that year, marking the start of a new political process.

Since then, Turkey has maintained a measured military presence and continued coordination with authorities in Tripoli. After the formation of the Government of National Unity led by Abdul Hamid Dbeibah in March 2021, Ankara strengthened its political and military support, sustaining its partnership with the internationally recognized government despite ongoing political fragmentation and the failure to hold national elections by the end of 2021.

This cooperation has produced new memorandums of understanding, the latest of which was signed in March 2024 between the Turkish defense minister and Dbeibah, reaffirming the original agreements as the foundation of bilateral defense cooperation.

Amid persistent tensions, Turkey has repeatedly renewed its parliamentary mandate: first for 18 months in June 2021, then for two more years in November 2023, and most recently through the current extension effective January 2026.

Ankara sees its presence as vital to upholding the ceasefire, supporting the political dialogue, and preventing the collapse of Libya’s fragile stability while also safeguarding its strategic interests in the Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa.

Turkey insists its deployment in Libya is based on an official request from a legitimate government and rooted in publicly declared bilateral agreements consistent with international law. This, Ankara argues, distinguishes its forces from foreign occupiers and reinforces its claim that the intervention serves Libyan sovereignty rather than undermining it.

Strategic and Security Objectives

Turkey justifies its ongoing military presence in Libya with a mix of interwoven security and political rationales, framed as protecting national interests within the bounds of international law. Ankara considers its forces a forward defensive line against potential threats from irregular armed groups, helping to prevent Libya from sliding back into chaos an outcome that could trigger renewed migration waves or the resurgence of terrorist groups.

Both scenarios are seen as direct threats to Turkish national security and regional stability in the Eastern Mediterranean.

The latest presidential memorandum submitted to the Turkish Parliament emphasized that stabilizing Libya has become integral to Turkey’s national security doctrine. It warned that ongoing political divisions and stalled elections threaten the relative calm achieved since the ceasefire agreement.

The memorandum also reaffirmed Turkey’s commitment to supporting UN efforts for national reconciliation and comprehensive elections, asserting that preventing a resurgence of violence is essential for these initiatives to succeed.

In parallel, Ankara stresses its respect for Libyan sovereignty and territorial integrity and continues to provide training and technical support to Libyan forces in Tripoli based on the bilateral security agreement. This reflects a broader effort to help build a unified national army capable of maintaining stability and confronting emerging threats.

Yet Turkey’s security calculus goes beyond immediate threats. According to observers, its role in Libya has evolved from a tactical intervention into a long-term strategic posture. Turkish support for the Libyan government altered the military balance on the ground and cemented Ankara’s role as a key actor in any future settlement.

This approach aligns with broader geopolitical objectives particularly concerning energy politics and regional influence in the Eastern Mediterranean. Libya’s strategic location and resource potential make it a vital asset in the region’s maritime power dynamics.

Turkey’s presence there provides leverage and bolsters its negotiating position on contentious issues such as maritime boundaries and access to offshore energy reserves.

In this light, Ankara views Libya as integral to its broader East Mediterranean strategy. Its presence is not temporary but a cornerstone of regional influence that affirms Turkey’s status as a pivotal player in shaping the future of the area.

Moreover, Ankara sees its partnership with Tripoli as essential for safeguarding past gains most notably the 2019 maritime demarcation agreement, which Turkey considers a strategic achievement. Continued support ensures these agreements remain in effect and blocks the possibility of rival deals that could threaten Turkish interests in the Mediterranean.

Gains and Risks

Nearly five years into its military intervention, Turkey finds itself balancing the strategic dividends of its involvement in Libya against a growing set of challenges and risks. While some view this presence as a geopolitical asset, others warn of its potential costs. Turkey’s experience in Libya presents a complex picture of influence weighed against burden.

Strategic Gains

Regional Influence: Turkey’s military footprint in North Africa has provided it with a valuable platform to project regional power, particularly on sensitive issues such as security, stability, and energy. Through its security partnership with Tripoli, Ankara has become an indispensable player in Libya’s political and economic future.

The presence underpinned by legal agreements has extended Turkish influence well beyond military engagement.

Maritime and Energy Interests: Libya is central to the regional contest over maritime boundaries and energy exploration in the Eastern Mediterranean. The 2019 agreement with the GNA granted Turkey legal and geopolitical leverage in the face of rival blocs including Egypt, Greece, and Cyprus. Sustaining a military presence helps preserve that agreement and prevents its reversal through potential rival deals in Turkey’s absence.

Security and Intelligence: Turkey’s position in Libya enhances its intelligence capabilities, allowing it to monitor extremist groups and smuggling networks across Libya and the Sahel. It also enables Turkey to cultivate a local security partner through military training efforts, reducing cross-border threats and reinforcing its counterterrorism agenda.

Economic Prospects: Ankara is betting on future reconstruction opportunities in Libya, which are expected to accelerate once political stability is restored. These opportunities could benefit Turkish firms in infrastructure, energy, and construction especially in oil and electricity sectors thanks to the strong political and security ties with Tripoli.

Key Risks and Challenges

Military and Political Overextension: Even a seemingly calculated foreign deployment carries risks. Renewed fighting could embroil Turkish troops in a costly conflict with potential losses and political fallout. Any military setbacks could become a domestic liability for the government.

Diplomatic Strain: Turkey’s continued military presence may exacerbate tensions with European powers such as France and Greece, who see it as destabilizing. Moreover, its presence contradicts UN calls for the withdrawal of foreign forces, potentially exposing Ankara to diplomatic criticism or countermeasures especially if US or EU policies shift.

Reversal of Gains if Withdrawn Abruptly: Ironically, one of the greatest risks lies in an unplanned Turkish exit. A hasty or disorganized withdrawal could unravel the 2019 maritime deal and open the door for adversaries to forge new agreements that sideline Ankara in key energy and security dynamics in the Mediterranean.

In sum, Turkey’s latest extension of its military mandate in Libya is less a tactical move than a reaffirmation of a long-term strategic posture. Ankara sees this presence as an investment in regional influence more than a simple military deployment.

However, the success of this strategy depends on two critical factors: Turkey’s ability to avoid drawn-out entanglement, and Libya’s ability to achieve a political settlement. Between influence and burden, Libya remains a key proving ground for Turkish foreign policy in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Download this article as PDF
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Telegram Email Copy Link
زيد اسليم
By Zaid Esleem Journalist and analyst specializing in Turkish affairs
Follow:
Previous Article نون بوست Via WhatsApp and With Lavish Salaries: How the UAE Recruited Colombians for Sudan’s War
Next Article نون بوست Syria’s New Tax System: A New Era of Simplification and Digitization

Read More

  • After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party? After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party?
  • "The heavy price Syrians paid will unite them": An interview with Dr. Radwan Ziadeh
  • After the Hasakah and Kobani elections, how far has the formation of Syria’s parliament progressed?
  • Graves without names: How many people are missing in Sudan’s war?
  • Asian partnerships and alternative corridors: Abu Dhabi’s strategy to escape the Gulf umbrella
part of the design
NoonPost Weekly Newsletter

You May Also Like

After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party?

After the court ruling, who is running Türkiye’s Republican People’s Party?

نون إنسايت Noon Insight 25 May ,2026
“The heavy price Syrians paid will unite them”: An interview with Dr. Radwan Ziadeh

“The heavy price Syrians paid will unite them”: An interview with Dr. Radwan Ziadeh

علي مكسور Ali Maksour 25 May ,2026
After the Hasakah and Kobani elections, how far has the formation of Syria’s parliament progressed?

After the Hasakah and Kobani elections, how far has the formation of Syria’s parliament progressed?

حسن إبراهيم Hasan Ebrahim 25 May ,2026
NoonPost

An independent media platform founded in 2013, rooted in slow journalism, producing in-depth reports, analysis, and multimedia content to offer deeper perspectives on the news, led by a diverse young team from several Arab countries.

  • Politics
  • Society
  • Economy
  • Culture
  • Interviews
  • In Depth
  • Explainers
  • Stories
  • Profiles
  • Focus
  • Latest Reports
  • Long Reads
  • Interviews
  • Interactive
  • About Us
  • Our Writers
  • Write for Us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advanced Search
Some rights reserved under a Creative Commons license

Removed from favorites

Undo
Go to mobile version